(10) Composite Report on three Korean Navy Civilians List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, "Special Questions on Koreans" (U.S. National Archives). (注；Stiffmuscle氏のエントリーからの転載）
秦郁彦氏、尾形美明氏、加瀬英明氏に対し、" Composite Report on three Korean Navy Civilians List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, "Special Questions on Koreans" (U.S. National Archives)というタイトルのついた文書の公開を切望する。
Additionally, in 1945, in depositions of three Korean civilians in the employment of the Japanese Army, they stated “In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If any of the women had been victims of coercion, all Koreans, young and old, would have risen up in rage, regardless of whatever retaliation, and killed the Japanese.” This is taken from “Composite Report Three Korean Civilians List No. 78,” dated 28 March, 1945, “Special Questions on Koreans” (U.S. National Archives).
URL http://www.sdh-fact.com (snip) The second can be found in depositions taken from three Korean civilian employees of the Japanese army, who stated the following: In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If the women had been victims of coercion, all the Koreans both young and old would have risen up in rage, and regardless of whatever retaliation, killed the Japanese (from Composite Report on Three Korean Civilians, List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, “Special Question on Koreans” in the U.S. National Archives).
この３つの引用文を見比べてみて、腑に落ちない点があるので、それをまとめてみた。
著者（敬称略）
出版年月日
引用文献の英語タイトル
秦郁彦
1999/06/30
Composite Report on three Korean Navy Civilians List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, "Special Questions on Koreans" (U.S. National Archives).
尾形美明
Composite Report Three Korean Civilians List No. 78,” dated 28 March, 1945, “Special Questions on Koreans (U.S. National Archives).
加瀬英明
2007/02/16
Composite Report on Three Korean Civilians, List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, “Special Question on Koreans” in the U.S. National Archives).
１，three かThreeか？ ２，Navyが原文にあるのかないのか？ ３，Civilians List No. 78 か Civilians, List No. 78か？（カンマがあったほうが自然ではあるが） ４，3名に対する尋問調書なのに、"composite report（尋問調書集約報告）"というタイトルは不自然。
In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If any of the women had been victims of coercion, all Koreans, young and old, would have risen up in rage, regardless of whatever retaliation, and killed the Japanese.
日本語
なし
加瀬英明
英語
In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If the women had been victims of coercion, all the Koreans both young and old would have risen up in rage, and regardless of whatever retaliation, killed the Japanese
・the Korean comofort women we met － 1945年に"comfort women"という表現があったのか？ 原文の"comfort women we met"は"comfort women we had met"であろう。 ・either volunteers, or women - カンマは不必要 ・victims of coercion - 「強制であることの被害者」というのは意味がわからないし、 「強制動員」という訳にはならない。"victims of abduction" とか "victims of kiddnapping"なら理解できる。 ・regardless of whatever retaliation - 節として不完全 they recieved などがつくはずである。
秦郁彦氏、尾形美明氏、加瀬英明氏に対し、" Composite Report on three Korean Navy Civilians List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, "Special Questions on Koreans" (U.S. National Archives)というタイトルのついた文書の公開を切望する。
Additionally, in 1945, in depositions of three Korean civilians in the employment of the Japanese Army, they stated “In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If any of the women had been victims of coercion, all Koreans, young and old, would have risen up in rage, regardless of whatever retaliation, and killed the Japanese.” This is taken from “Composite Report Three Korean Civilians List No. 78,” dated 28 March, 1945, “Special Questions on Koreans” (U.S. National Archives).
URL http://www.sdh-fact.com (snip) The second can be found in depositions taken from three Korean civilian employees of the Japanese army, who stated the following: In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If the women had been victims of coercion, all the Koreans both young and old would have risen up in rage, and regardless of whatever retaliation, killed the Japanese (from Composite Report on Three Korean Civilians, List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, “Special Question on Koreans” in the U.S. National Archives).
この３つの引用文を見比べてみて、腑に落ちない点があるので、それをまとめてみた。
著者（敬称略）
出版年月日
引用文献の英語タイトル
秦郁彦
1999/06/30
Composite Report on three Korean Navy Civilians List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, "Special Questions on Koreans" (U.S. National Archives).
尾形美明
Composite Report Three Korean Civilians List No. 78,” dated 28 March, 1945, “Special Questions on Koreans (U.S. National Archives).
加瀬英明
2007/02/16
Composite Report on Three Korean Civilians, List No. 78, dated 28 March 1945, “Special Question on Koreans” in the U.S. National Archives).
１，three かThreeか？ ２，Navyが原文にあるのかないのか？ ３，Civilians List No. 78 か Civilians, List No. 78か？（カンマがあったほうが自然ではあるが） ４，3名に対する尋問調書なのに、"composite report（尋問調書集約報告）"というタイトルは不自然。
In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If any of the women had been victims of coercion, all Koreans, young and old, would have risen up in rage, regardless of whatever retaliation, and killed the Japanese.
日本語
なし
加瀬英明
英語
In the battle zones of the Pacific War, the Korean comfort women we met were all either volunteers, or women who had been sold by their parents. If the women had been victims of coercion, all the Koreans both young and old would have risen up in rage, and regardless of whatever retaliation, killed the Japanese
・the Korean comofort women we met － 1945年に"comfort women"という表現があったのか？ 原文の"comfort women we met"は"comfort women we had met"であろう。 ・either volunteers, or women - カンマは不必要 ・victims of coercion - 「強制であることの被害者」というのは意味がわからないし、 「強制動員」という訳にはならない。"victims of abduction" とか "victims of kiddnapping"なら理解できる。 ・regardless of whatever retaliation - 節として不完全 they recieved などがつくはずである。
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Stiffmuscle/20070817/p1 注目すべきブログ記事です。ブログ「Stiffmuscleの日記」のStiffmuscleさんが「慰安婦」問題についての文書公開を三名の知識人に求めています。 秦郁彦氏、尾形美明氏、加瀬英明氏に対し、” Composite Report on three K
